A Company in Europe Shows Why VDI Is Relevant

Imagine that you’re an engineer working for an aircraft manufacturer. The main portion of your job revolves around designing. You use software and hardware to help you do this; A computer, laptop or tablet and the applications necessary for creating 3D models. When you travel it is difficult to do work because you need powerful hardware to run your applications. Laptops might suffice, but tablets fast becoming another great way to be efficient while “on the go”. Installing high-level graphics cards, however, on every tablet  – for every worker – is expensive.

Now imagine if each mobile device could efficiently render a 3D image of an aircraft by using centralized power from servers. Users are able to access this power from any device, even those without a powerful graphics cards. This is exactly what European company, Airbus, is doing through VDI. This is a great article to read.

Even if we’re in Maine, it’s important to acknowledge the attempts other companies are making to be more efficient. Airbus is currently going through a restructuring of its business and during this process they will probably research heavily new technologies that could boost efficiency. Businesses in Maine that are also looking to implement 21st century technology can observe these trends by larger corporations and take note.

The main reason that Airbus is implementing VDI is because it saves them time. I welcome comments from other perspectives, but I would say that time is the biggest reason in this situation. Getting users up and running quickly creates a culture of adaptation and flexibility.  This type of flexibility makes the company leaner because it streamlines a process that once was rigid. For example, the typical way of doing things would have been to purchase extremely high end devices and have employees use them. Now, employees can use any device, regardless of its power, and be guaranteed the rendering needed to work on processor-intensive applications.

Users also become unfazed by software updates. In fact, “unfazed” might be too lite a term. The only thing a user does is log into their interface on whichever device and patches are done automatically on the server. This means that each user is given (or not “given”, but has access to) this update and the IT department isn’t scrambling around to each device to ensure the update was successful.

Arnaud Albinet, Project Manager at Airbus, describes this perfectly:

The desktop is just a clone of the master desktop which is constantly updated. When you want to deploy an application, you don’t need to deploy it on each desktop, you deploy it on the master desktop and then you replicate.

This has also created mobility for employees. The term mobility has been used since we moved from horses to cars. It has also been a popular term for cell phones – which we now simply call “mobile devices”. But VDI is the true “holy grail”, so to speak, of the mobility movement known as BYOD (Bring-Your-Own-Device) because it frees users from being pigeonholed to one device.

I know what Albinet means when he says that VDI was appealing, not because of the cost savings, but rather because of flexibility in the tool. Economically, however, flexibility ends up resulting in a lot of cost savings. As we move forward with progress in VDI technology I’m sure the ability to audit its efficiency will only improve.

Facebook Comments

70 comments for “A Company in Europe Shows Why VDI Is Relevant

  1. Pingback: sneakers
  2. Pingback: shoes for sale
  3. Pingback: dildo review
  4. Pingback: adam and eve
  5. Pingback: g spot vibrater
  6. Pingback: best email server
  7. Pingback: runway tv
  8. Pingback: Florida
  9. Pingback: yoblogmy
  10. Pingback: fall fashion sale
  11. Pingback: fall fashion sale
  12. Pingback: fall fashion sale
  13. Pingback: usuwanie dpf
  14. Pingback: tibia download
  15. Pingback: antiskid tape
  16. Pingback: Mu Cang Chai Tour
  17. Pingback: #energy healing
  18. Pingback: iron stair parts
  19. Pingback: vibrating ring
  20. Pingback: adammale.com
  21. Pingback: Garden Bridges
  22. Pingback: adult confession
  23. Pingback: Bizarre Sex Toys
  24. Pingback: survival site
  25. Pingback: ebooks for resale
  26. Pingback: Évora
  27. Pingback: strapon
  28. Pingback: Love swing
  29. Pingback: adamandeve.com
  30. Pingback: Young Money
  31. Pingback: #newtrends
  32. Pingback: dildos
  33. April 8, 2016 at 6:21 PM

    Very good write-up. I absolutely love this site. Keep it up!

  34. April 8, 2016 at 6:36 AM

    Howdy! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group?
    There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content.

    Please let me know. Thanks

  35. April 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM

    Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to
    no backup. Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

  36. Mike Alley
    October 30, 2015 at 8:47 AM

    If Airbus is doing this, we have to consider what type of assessment they went through. I mean, they’re not stupid. They must know what they’re doing.

  37. Anonymous
    October 29, 2015 at 2:21 PM

    “Flexibility.”?

    This sounds very much like a veiled way of saying “the flexibility to hire and fire on a whim and make people buy their own computer and work from ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE.” Since there is no cost savings by purchasing such a system in the first place, there has to be another way to save money. Most businesses won’t buy something that increases their expenses and has no increase in profit.

    I read the whole article. Interestingly, Airbus likes the fact that they can use tablets to view engineering models of their aircraft. I am not sure why you would care about this, since you might as well just use something that people can actually see (like a projector or TV). Otherwise, why do the engineers need to view what is essentially marketing materials while out of the office?

    All in all, I just don’t see what they are seeing and I have a hard time imagining that it’s going to be good for employees. Maybe a zero sum game, but not beneficial.

Comments are closed.